**
“Contract Law and Theory” by Robert E. Scott and Jody Kraus is a comprehensive treatise that delves deeply into the principles, doctrines, and theoretical underpinnings of contract law. The book is structured to bridge the gap between legal theory and practice while providing practical advice and numerous examples to illustrate key concepts. Below is a structured summary of the main points from the book, including concrete examples and specific actions that individuals can take when applying the guidance provided.

Main Point: Understanding the Fundamentals
Scott and Kraus begin by outlining the basic elements of contract law, emphasizing the importance of mutual assent, consideration, and enforceability. They provide a thorough overview of contract formation, terms, performance, and remedies.

Example: The authors present the case of Lucy v. Zehmer, illustrating the concept of mutual assent through the famous “napkin contract.” This case involved an agreement written on a bar napkin which one party later claimed was a joke, but the court found it to be a valid contract due to the outward appearance of serious intent.

Action: When forming a contract, ensure that all parties clearly express their intention to be bound and document the terms in writing, even in informal settings, to avoid disputes over mutual assent.

Main Point: Creation of Contracts
The authors discuss the requirements for contract formation, including offer, acceptance, and consideration. They focus on the objective theory of contracts, which states that a party’s intent is determined by their outward expressions rather than their internal thoughts.

Example: In the case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co., the court upheld an offer that was accepted by performance rather than a direct response, underscoring the importance of clear and unequivocal terms in an offer.

Action: When drafting an offer, ensure that the terms are explicit and leave no room for ambiguity. Also, ensure that any offers made can be accepted in a manner clearly understood by all parties.

Main Point: Consideration and Reliance
Scott and Kraus explore the doctrine of consideration, which requires that something of value be exchanged for a promise to be enforceable. They also delve into exceptions like promissory estoppel, where a promise may be enforced to prevent injustice due to significant reliance by the promisee.

Example: The authors highlight the case of Ricketts v. Scothorn, where a grandfather’s promise to his granddaughter was enforced under promissory estoppel because she relied on it to her detriment by quitting her job.

Action: When relying on a promise, ensure there is a clear record of how the promise was made and any actions taken in reliance on it. This can help establish the grounds for promissory estoppel if the promise is not otherwise supported by consideration.

Main Point: Interpreting Contracts
The principles of contract interpretation are discussed extensively, including the “plain meaning” rule and the use of extrinsic evidence. The authors also cover the importance of context in understanding and interpreting contract terms.

Example: In Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co., the court considered extrinsic evidence to interpret an indemnity clause, emphasizing that the contract should be read in its full context.

Action: When drafting contract terms, strive for clarity and consistency. Avoid legal jargon that could be ambiguous and include definitions for critical terms. If a term could have multiple meanings, specify the intended meaning to prevent misinterpretation.

Main Point: Valid Defenses
Several defenses to the enforcement of contracts are identified, including lack of capacity, duress, undue influence, misrepresentation, and unconscionability.

Example: The authors reference the case of Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., where a contract was found to be unconscionable due to its highly one-sided terms which disadvantaged the consumer.

Action: When entering into a contract, ensure that the terms are fair and balanced. Both parties should fully understand and freely consent to the terms without any undue pressure or manipulation.

Main Point: Performance Obligations
Scott and Kraus explain the criteria for substantial performance and material breach, highlighting the consequences for failing to meet contractual obligations.

Example: They use the case of Jacob & Youngs v. Kent, where the contractor’s minor deviation from the specified materials did not constitute a material breach. The court ruled in favor of substantial performance, awarding less than full damages.

Action: When fulfilling contract obligations, aim for full compliance with the terms. If deviations are necessary, communicate them to the other party and seek their acceptance to avoid disputes over performance standards.

Main Point: Legal Remedies
The book covers the various remedies available for breach of contract, including compensatory damages, specific performance, and restitution. Scott and Kraus emphasize the principle of placing the aggrieved party in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed.

Example: They discuss the case of Hadley v. Baxendale, which established the rule for foreseeability in awarding consequential damages. The case ruled that damages must be foreseeable and directly tied to the breach.

Action: When entering into a contract, clearly define the scope of potential damages and ensure all parties understand the implications of a breach. Including limitation of liability clauses can help manage risk.

Main Point: Changing or Ending Contracts
The authors outline the processes for legally modifying or terminating contracts, reflecting on the importance of mutual consent and consideration for modifications.

Example: In the case of Alaska Packers’ Ass’n v. Domenico, the court found that promises to pay additional amounts without new consideration were unenforceable because the contractors were already bound by the original agreement.

Action: When seeking to modify a contract, ensure that any changes are supported by new consideration and documented in writing. Both parties should explicitly agree to the modifications to avoid future disputes.

Main Point: Contracts and Public Policy
Scott and Kraus examine how public policy considerations can affect contract enforceability, particularly in cases involving illegal or immoral acts.

Example: An example provided is the case of Bovard v. American Horse Enterprises, where a contract for the sale of drug paraphernalia was deemed unenforceable as it violated public policy.

Action: Ensure that contracts do not involve activities that are illegal or contrary to public policy. Seek legal advice to confirm that the contract terms are lawful and enforceable.

Main Point: Theoretical Perspectives
The book offers insights into various theories that explain the function of contract law, including economic efficiency, fairness, and relational contracts. Scott and Kraus discuss the relevance of these theories in shaping legal doctrines and practices.

Example: They reference economic analysis, such as in Posner’s theory, which suggests that contract law should aim to maximize economic efficiency by enforcing promises that facilitate mutually beneficial exchanges.

Action: Consider the broader impact of contract terms on economic and social relationships. Strive to create contracts that not only meet legal standards but also support fairness and transparency in business dealings.

In summary, “Contract Law and Theory” by Robert E. Scott and Jody Kraus is an invaluable resource for understanding the intricate details of contract law. It blends theoretical insights with practical advice, making it a foundational text for both law students and practicing professionals. By following the principles and examples provided, individuals can navigate contract formation, performance, and enforcement with greater clarity and confidence.